Duration
192h Pr
Number of credits
| Master in architecture (120 ECTS) | 15 crédits |
Lecturer
Lisa De Visscher, Emeric Marchal, Bastien Pilet, Benoît Vandenbulcke
Coordinator
Language(s) of instruction
French language
Organisation and examination
Teaching in the second semester
Schedule
Units courses prerequisite and corequisite
Prerequisite or corequisite units are presented within each program
Learning unit contents
Buildings that seem too large, spaces too high, ceilings too low, constructions that seem inappropriate to accommodate the current technical paraphernalia : Today, many buildings from 20th century are disused or obsolete, and constitute a heritage that requires us to take a position, to intervene and even start planning.
Between a redemptive "clean slate" and restless conservatism, there is always another way, less visible, questioning the existing without prejudice or inhibition. This attitude is more interested in connections, resonances between things than in the solitary project, considering the context as the generator of the project. The studio offers to discover the urban, architectural, environmental and societal potentials of adaptive reuse.
Responding to ecological concerns and taking into account limited economic resources, the studio considers that a reconfiguration of use and reuse of materials can provide new dynamics and possibilities. It proposes to work in real situations (abandoned, underused, unsuitable buildings), in specific contexts (urban, peri-urban), with programs to be defined.
During the academic year 2023-24, the studio will continue to work on the city of Brussels in collaboration with the project studio TRAME (Territoire Réaffectation Architecture Mémoire Matérialité Empathie) of the ULB and the BouwmeesterMaitreArchitecte in Brussels.
The students will work in a situation as close to reality as possible, on existing buildings in the purpose of an adaptive reuse and on real programs, following a competition procedure written out by the Brussels Bouwmeester. The student will visit the existing buildings, will have to take its measurements in situ, and reconstruct an "existing situation" as the basis of the reconversion work. He/she will be asked to develop a project that meets the given program as well as spatial, structural and constructive needs all at once. In a second phase, the project will be developed into detail, which will require the student to make choices on material, technical and constructive issues.
Faculty teachers as well as external professionals will be invited to share their experiences on the multiple areas of conversion which are architectural, socio-cultural, economic, circular, and about energy, heritage and temporary occupancy. These exchanges will be planned in the studio schedule, through presentations, visits, and table discussions on the projects in progress.
Provisional planning:
- Introduction to the studio and the theme
- Site visits, research and selection of the buildings
- Constitution of the existing situation (plans, sections, models) and of the research paper on the analysis of the buildings.
- Workshop in Brussels and visits
- Outline: development of a project principle responding to the challenges of the building itself but also of its context.
- Intermediate presentation
- Pre-project: project development: both from a spatial and technical point of view.
- Project: study of the project as a whole from the urban / landscape scale to technical detail
- Presentation and final jury
Learning outcomes of the learning unit
By articulating theoretical knowledge, critical methods and creative and imaginative approaches, at the end of the workshop the student will demonstrate his/her competence in designing the built and non-built space in a projective and / or productive way through multi-scale architectural compositions inscribed in an environmental, historical, cultural, social, economic and political context imbedded in the adaptive reuse of an existing building. The student will have to demonstrate an understanding of the context in order to argue for sensitive, global and sustainable solutions.
The student will be able to:
- redraw the existing situation of a building in its context with a view to its transformation / reconversion.
- evaluate the heritage value of a building and detect its weaknesses and strengths with a view to its adaptation.
- understand the architectural challenges of an existing building, recognize its qualities in terms of space, structure, context, and also culture.
- measure the value of the reuse from an environmental point of view by assessing the value of the building's footprint.
- formulate a sustainable architectural response in the particular context of reconversion.
- develop a program that can fit into this building by taking advantage of its existing qualities.
- develop an architectural project responding to the situation and the program.
- offer technical and constructive solutions at detail level.
Prerequisite knowledge and skills
Planned learning activities and teaching methods
The main space for teaching is the studio: a place of individual or collective exchange between the students and the teachers, based on the students' weekly production and their pro-activity. The work is individual or in groups for some aspects. The studio organizes the learning process in a variety of ways: collective sessions, instruction or debriefing sessions, round tables allowing questions and information to be shared, one-to-one discussions based on the work of the student, presentations and collegial reviews.
In addition to the development of the projects themselves, certain other educational approaches can be organized, such as presentations during the studio, quick separated exercises, internal or external workshops, study trips, visits, external conferences, intervention of speakers at the studio; each studio session will clearly determine the compulsory or optional nature of these particular approaches in its description, as well as the methods of evaluation of these activities.
The work can be individual, in small or large groups depending on the phases and the nature of the exercise.
The students may also present their work in an exhibition, or organize presentations, writing exercises and publications, making contact with actors in the field or the general public; which will prepare them for professional life in its cultural and societal dimension.
In general, the master's studio develops pedagogies that prepare students for the current conditions of the practice of the profession of architect, by making them aware of the cultural, social, economic and environmental realities, which are now disrupting classic models and lines of reflection and action on the built environment (a need / a client / a site / a project).
The studio is part of an interuniversity collaboration between Uliège and TU Wien which aims to create exchanges between students and teachers on the theme of adaptive reuse. Joint exercises, conferences and meetings are organized between the different universities and the students. Students will have to work occasionally with students from these other universities.
The studio will develop a research-project methodology allowing students to trace the process they put in place for their project. The workshop proposes to host TFE-projects on the theme of reconversion. It is complementary to the Q4 "Iacobus" studio by C. Houbart, P. Noé and M. Frisena.
Mode of delivery (face to face, distance learning, hybrid learning)
Blended learning
Additional information:
Teaching takes place mainly in person in the studio. Special learning arrangements (publication of a syllabus or various notes, distance learning, use of a specific website, comments by emails, setting up systems for the storage and collective dissemination of information and data, dissemination platforms used) will be specified at the start of the studio. One part of the studio could take place virtually through the platforms Lifesize and Miro.
Recommended or required readings
Any notes recommended or compulsory readings are specified at the start of the studio.
More generally, students are encouraged to undertake their own research and to explore their curiosity (library, travel, etc.), in order to form a critical judgment.
The evaluation is continuous in the form of a reflective process with resource persons outside the studio and a regular evaluation between peers. Two more formal evaluations - an intermediate jury an d final jury - are organized with an external jury.
Quoting:
- Continuous evaluation : 20% of the final quote
- Intermediate jury: 30% of the final quote
- Final jury: 50% of the final quote
Work placement(s)
Organisational remarks and main changes to the course
Contacts
Prof. Benoît Vandenbulcke - bvandenbulcke@uliege.be
Lisa De Visscher - ldevisscher@uliege.be
Emeric Marchal - Emeric.Marchal@uliege.be